Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory116.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 19:30
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$647
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 1,094
97% 819 Pts
64-Core 2,516
156% 2,516 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 39
Parallax 36.6
34% 39.1 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 40
Splatting 26.2
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$100
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 371 380 383 382 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 460
Write 389
Mixed 276
SusWrite 376
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 31.3
103% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 272
221% 315 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 116%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 78 85 83 94 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 634
Write 44.4
Mixed 126
SusWrite 86
48% 222 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 21.5
79% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 639
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 278
239% 364 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 157%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$81
466GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 408 400 401 399 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 459
Mixed 382
SusWrite 404
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 34.1
113% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 285
232% 330 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$100
466GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 410 403 403 403 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 415
Mixed 330
SusWrite 406
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 33.5
113% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 244
200% 288 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$100
466GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 345 400 403 317 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 481
Write 284
Mixed 288
SusWrite 366
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 33
112% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 210
175% 258 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
861GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 200 200 200 199 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 146
Mixed 79
SusWrite 198
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 63.5
MC Mixed 40.9
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 9.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 119%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback