Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacPro5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory120.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 11:38
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU-A (00), 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 156
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 534
48% 405 Pts
64-Core 1,315
81% 1,315 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.1% Very good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 100
Parallax 95.9
72% 94.9 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 87.7
Splatting 78.2
69% 84.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 50 41 40 43 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 224
Write 206
Mixed 195
SusWrite 65.4
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 28.7
94% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 39.6
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 48.5
40% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 118%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
446GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 953 865 833 835 838 833 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,104
Write 895
Mixed 849
SusWrite 860
208% 927 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 33.8
113% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 307
224% 293 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 145%
Great: 276%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
881GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 184 184 184 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 157
Mixed 84
SusWrite 183
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 23.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 7R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 33% 42 300 246 60 23" 1920 1200 APP921E Cinema HD Display
History: Score 16: 3R 0G 1B | Score 44: 4R 5G 9B | Score 56: 7R 7G 0B
Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback