Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7600-$191 4,159 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 54.2 40% 56 Pts	4-Core 27.5 8-Core 33.6 4% 30.5 Pts	64-Core 31.7 2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 631GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 108 107 103 101 107 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.6% Above average	Read 243 Write 201 Mixed 209 SusWrite 99.7 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 38.7 115% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 143 107% 141 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 133%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 160GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 144GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 26.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 10.8 14% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 3.6 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7600Intel $191Bench 40%, 4,159 samples	19x
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 2,160 samples	13x
GeForce 9400NvidiaBench 1%, 668 samples	8x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $219