Asus 1000H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus 1000H  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1000H
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090721
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 13:39
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Atom N270
PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Memory 37.6
1-Core 9.8
2-Core 15.5
17% 21 Pts
4-Core 15.5
8-Core 15.9
2% 15.7 Pts
64-Core 15.6
1% 15.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 33%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$63
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 61 60 59 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 59.3
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 57.5
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.9 8.2 9 8.5 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 26.4
Write 11.3
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 9
18% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
101% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.93% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback