Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 01:30
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 106
54% 83 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 337
33% 271 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Device(0000 0000) 1.5GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 46
Parallax 31.1
22% 34.6 fps
MRender 43.5
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 30
26% 32 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 132 142 155 174 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 334
Write 212
Mixed 279
SusWrite 155
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 27
93% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 39.4
36% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 118%
INTENSO 256GB
38GB free
Firmware: S8FM07.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 72 7.3 6.9 8.1 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 192
Write 292
Mixed 121
SusWrite 25.7
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 10.8
54% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 12.6
16% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 143 148 160 173 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 125
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 160
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HTS542516K9S 160GB
101GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 29.9
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 29.8
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600LL Series 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback