Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory1.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140205
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateDec 24 '20 at 21:38
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 196
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 567
54% 446 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 SE
Device(0000 0000) 1.5GB
CLim: 736 MHz, MLim: 957 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 11.4
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 14
12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 67 51 43 67 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 7.5
Write 133
Mixed 123
SusWrite 58.5
19% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 12.3
65% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 70.8
DQ Mixed 6.7
31% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
239GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 122 123 119 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 151
Write 123
Mixed 83
SusWrite 123
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 114%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
906GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 69 75 72 68 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 125
Write 134
Mixed 105
SusWrite 72.8
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57%
Great: 83%
Maxell HDD 250GB
103GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 15.6
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 17.8
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 18%
ASMT 2115 3TB
1TB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 130 124 129 124 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 118
Write 125
Mixed 37
SusWrite 125
135% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB M378B5273CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $194
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback