PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3227-A1 |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680x1050x4294967296 szín, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140205 |
Uptime | 13.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 24 '20 at 21:38 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
71.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 SE
Device(0000 0000) 1.5GB
CLim: 736 MHz, MLim: 957 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.13
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 67 51 43 67 32 MB/s
|
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
239GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 122 123 119 124 MB/s
|
78.6%
Very good
|
|||
57%
Above average
|
||||
Maxell HDD 250GB
103GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 23 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMT 2115 3TB
1TB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 130 124 129 124 110 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 85x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 32x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 59x |
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 33x |
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $194 |