Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170517
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 19:48
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 768
77% 627 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
CLim: 1055 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 75.4
Parallax 98.1
62% 83.1 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 46.7
48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,402
Write 2,284
Mixed 1,638
469% 2,108 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 93.5
319% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,602
DQ Write 1,364
DQ Mixed 1431
1,086% 1,466 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
123GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 475 474 415 375 377 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 473
Mixed 421
SusWrite 432
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63.9
216% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 130%
Great: 129%
Samsung SSD 250GB
74GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 300 299 299 298 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 465
Mixed 368
SusWrite 318
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 60.3
204% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 118%
Great: 126%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 160 165 172 171 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 132
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 168
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 107%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 170 170 170 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 91.2
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 169
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 161 162 162 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 150
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 160
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
224% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $638
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback