Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJul 04 '14 at 10:55
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 172
60% 131 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 469
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
Asus(1043 8451) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3788
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 56
Parallax 69.7
49% 61.8 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 48.4
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 120GB-$65
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 504ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 101
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.23
69% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 83%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 142
Write 137
Mixed 137
105% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.27
98% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
941GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 119
Write 129
Mixed 95
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.19
64% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
910GB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 123
Write 130
Mixed 121
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.71
133% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 75%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 75.9
Write 71.8
Mixed 68.6
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.19
77% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
402GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 126
Mixed 113
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
285GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 92.8
Mixed 81.8
70% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.14
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 88%
Generic USB Disk 160GB
138GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 27.8
Mixed 9.21
26% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.24
63% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,003
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback