Asus X550VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus X550VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550VC
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140122
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 10:24
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 132
60% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 186
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 2.5
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3SMI2HTTBT120GB 120GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0811B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 94 99 53 51 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 399
Write 170
Mixed 184
SusWrite 74.6
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 18.4
80% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 21.4
DQ Mixed 66.4
59% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
349GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 81.7
Write 80.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 77
49% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 122
Write 20.5
Mixed 27
SusWrite 17.9
46% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
124% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.7% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550VC Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback