Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1007U 5,995 User benchmarks, average bench 39% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Memory 55.4 1-Core 24.3 2-Core 72.5 32% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 52.8 8-Core 57 7% 54.9 Pts	64-Core 62.4 4% 62.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 124D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB 2,059 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0617A SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 108 122 121 95 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 264 Write 126 Mixed 149 SusWrite 106 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 8.1 19% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 8.8 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	120x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	110x
Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples	69x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	274x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	120x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	10x

RAM
EBJ40UG8EFU0 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 3,036 samples	79x
HMT351S6EFR8A 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 505 samples	40x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 1x4GBMicronBench 29%, 1,972 samples	31x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28