Today's hottest deals

Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 960GC-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130823
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 08:32
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Memory 19.4
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 48
19% 33.6 Pts
4-Core 55.8
8-Core 48.8
7% 52.3 Pts
64-Core 54.9
3% 54.9 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
ASRock(1849 9616) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 5.9
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 116 140 122 93 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 232
Write 164
Mixed 194
SusWrite 120
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 21.3
75% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 43.1
51% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 92%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
390GB free
Firmware: 02.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 79 96 95 82 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 96.1
Write 85.9
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 89
61% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 64%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
2GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.3 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Read 8
Write 2.2
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 2.7
5% 4.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
52217, 52217 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.2
2% 0.67 GB/s
Latency 325
12% 325 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback