QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 11:20
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 1,006
96% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,282
79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 158
Parallax 101
80% 119 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 96.9
80% 98.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
556GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 755 138 721 496 495 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,555
Write 1,155
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 515
252% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 48.8
157% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 343
250% 328 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 157%
Great: 311%
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
437GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 51 0 154 230 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 38.4
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 37.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 94%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback