Asrock A320M

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170828
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '20 at 10:00
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 188 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 376 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 41.3 Parallax 38.8 30% 39.2 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 27.7 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Scorch M2 256GB 3,923 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FM11.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 196 210 212 213 214 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 804 Write 546 Mixed 616 SusWrite 248 124% 554 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 21.7 87% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 62.9 DQ Mixed 99 99% 169 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 151%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 127GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 169 106 105 107 106 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 527GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 137 140 137 141 141 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 174 Write 172 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 137 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 107%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 640GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 452GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 49 51 50 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 44.1 Write 42 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 49.1 30% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 62%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 3TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 53 55 54 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 143 Write 151 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 54.1 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 108%
ST940811 4A 40GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 17GB free, PID 0501 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 26 26 27 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 7.2 Mixed 12 SusWrite 26.2 23% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 13%
WD 2500BJK External 250GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 154GB free, PID 0704 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 37 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 20.6 40% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 21%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 115GB free, PID null, SanDisk Ultra Flair 128GB USB3.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 149 Write 70 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 46.2 105% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 3.7 264% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 44%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 250GB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 173GB free, PID 2100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.54% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 33.3 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 19 31% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.54% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2400C17-8GVR 2400 C16 Series 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	86.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 30.3 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 24.5 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	52x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	20x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	7x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	5x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GBAdataBench 42%, 10,940 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16