Asrock A320M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170828
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 01:26
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 189
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 379
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.5
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 36.6
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Scorch M2 256GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 211 202 213 213 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 814
Write 560
Mixed 606
SusWrite 239
124% 555 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 27.2
103% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 402
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 152
142% 227 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 151%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
103GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 232 105 108 106 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
230GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 157 165 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 137
Write 126
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 161
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 107%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 640GB
452GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 63 65 62 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 50.1
Write 43.7
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 62.1
34% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 62%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 66 67 68 66 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 77
SusWrite 67.6
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 108%
ST940811 4A 40GB
20GB free, PID 0501
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 7.3
Mixed 10
SusWrite 13.3
15% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 13%
WD 2500BJK External 250GB
165GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 36.8
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 14
38% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 21%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 250GB
173GB free, PID 2100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 33.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 13.3
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 18%
SDHC Card 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 13.4
Mixed 18
SusWrite 10.6
23% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1
68% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 33%
SDHC Card 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.35% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 20.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 10.6
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C17-8GVR 2400 C16 Series 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $290
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback