Lenovo 060613G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 060613G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 14:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 151
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 421
45% 357 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
Sapphire(174B A004) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 394 373 369 367 382 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 416
Write 381
Mixed 339
SusWrite 377
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 19.5
87% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 93.7
104% 169 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 121 123 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 121
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR8C 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 060613G Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: Lenovo 060613G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback