ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 11361B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 11361B3 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '17 at 10:23
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2643 0-$1,040 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 184 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 456 49% 389 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.84 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0365 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1026 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 442 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 18 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 42884 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 219 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 60 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 61580 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 42884 (F2) Unknown 100 100 66368	37.7% Below average	Read 250 Write 167 Mixed 198 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 12 55% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 17.4 DQ Write 29.6 DQ Mixed 31.8 22% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC56 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 147306696 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 238 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 211133328 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 20016 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 187 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 639041566 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 240 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 51539607582 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -49512382968269 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13569789015 (F2) Unknown 100 253 8703084212	98.6% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 167 Mixed 150 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.25 104% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR8C 3x4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3 of 8 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 28.9 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback