Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 07:29
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 75.8
37% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 147
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 2.6
2% 21.5 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 459 50 154 145 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 1,010
Write 747
Mixed 554
SusWrite 224
141% 634 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 34.6
128% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 123
130% 218 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 105%
Great: 209%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
268GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 107 101 98 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 142
Write 147
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 103
131% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK Kingston 9905711-017.A00G 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 13.5
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback