Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '19 at 16:02
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 36.7
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 119
39% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 401
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.41.36
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 3.59
2% 3.11 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 3.48
2% 3.01 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1014 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 213 202 209 212 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 355
Write 313
Mixed 324
SusWrite 210
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 38.5
128% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 217
211% 336 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 155%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 130 136 133 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 122
Write 111
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 134
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
206% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK Kingston 9905711-017.A00G 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 13
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.9
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-42 Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback