Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 16:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 825
87% 695 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 51.5
48% 56.5 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 52
46% 56.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 37 99 54 79 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 87.5
Write 111
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 79.6
20% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 30
102% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 79.6
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 182
116% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 100%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
191GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 125 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 161
Write 154
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 125
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 18.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback