Clevo M720T/M730T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo M720T/M730T  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO M720T/M730T
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 13:46
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3200
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 29.6
30% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 31.5
8-Core 36.1
4% 33.8 Pts
64-Core 39.6
2% 39.6 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel - famiglia Express Chipset 45
Clevo(1558 072F)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.23 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.21%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HH100-08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 40 37 29 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 37.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 32.5
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 36%
Generic USB SD Reader 256GB
228GB free, PID 6332
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.3 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.83% Terrible
Read 4.2
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.1
6% 4.22 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback