OEM H110

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	OEM H110 (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '20 at 03:15
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 55.9 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 209 65% 122 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 399 54% 404 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.8.1 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.8% Average	Lighting 53.7 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 72.4 44% 53.9 fps	MRender 59 Gravity 51.2 Splatting 43.1 41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 126 122 127 78 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 322 Write 190 Mixed 235 SusWrite 117 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 26.1 111% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 171 127% 165 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 400GB free Firmware: MEAOA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 109 104 107 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 92 Write 91 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 107 62% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 66%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 159 157 157 159 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 121 Write 114 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 157 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 100%
1TB free Firmware: 9128 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 112 118 112 110 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 157 155 157 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 147 Write 146 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 155 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 100%
ST10000N E0008-2JM101 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 9.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 114 116 115 118 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.1% Very good	Read 220 Write 196 Mixed 140 SusWrite 112 217% 167 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.6 318% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 78%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 231GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 53.7 Write 57.5 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 1.5 46% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 37%
ST4000NC 001-1FS168 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 86GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 113 116 115 118 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.3% Average	Read 164 Write 124 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 110 136% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 49%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 6TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.1 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 67.8 Write 109 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 9.8 90% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 0.9 390% 3.97 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 0.9 406% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 1x8GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110 Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: OEM H110

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	97x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	84x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	43x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	79x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	54x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	26x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	9x
CB8GU2666.C8RT 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 166 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16