HP 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 218D
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 14:53
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2810
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Memory 35
1-Core 15.3
2-Core 31.6
19% 27.3 Pts
4-Core 31.4
8-Core 31.5
4% 31.5 Pts
64-Core 34.2
2% 34.2 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
HP(103C 218D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.88
1% 0.89 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 167 171 184 200 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 202
Write 134
Mixed 179
SusWrite 184
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 9
58% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 96.2
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 13.6
31% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 90%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
143GB free
Firmware: 2501
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 37 38 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 36.9
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 38.2
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR16LS11/8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback