HP 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 218D
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131219
Uptime41.6 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 04:12
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2810
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 15.1
2-Core 37.8
28% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 36.7
8-Core 38.2
5% 37.5 Pts
64-Core 38.1
2% 38.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
HP(103C 218D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.47
Reflection 0.58
Parallax 0.53
0% 0.52 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.96
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OACA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 44 49 53 69 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 82
Write 80.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 52.9
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 8.8 5.1 6.3 5.1 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 12.1
SusWrite 5.7
13% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback