Asus B85M-GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150420
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '17 at 11:24
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 195 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 346 50% 367 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 16.7 16% 17.4 fps	MRender 22.8 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 16.7 16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2204 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 561 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 59 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10388336196	68.9% Good	Read 494 Write 240 Mixed 295 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 21.8 98% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 48.3 DQ Mixed 61.7 59% 96.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 765GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2241 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 986 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3520 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 848 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 964 (C2) HDA temperature 114 104 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	101% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 174 Mixed 162 129% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.31 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.38 137% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
Intenso portable SSD 124GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 38GB free, PID 2910 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 41.7 Write 16.6 Mixed 29 34% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.02 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.75 74% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 55%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 37GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 34.7 Write 13.9 Mixed 15.7 24% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.52 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.73 98% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 39%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 9GB free, PID 385a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	9.31% Terrible	Read 32.1 Write 13.7 Mixed 21 26% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.79 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 26% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.31% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GB 1,126 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-GAMER Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	129x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	83x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	67x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397