Today's hottest deals

Medion Erazer i72000/C057

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion Erazer i72000/C057  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 15:38
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 185
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 425
56% 423 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.80
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.6% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 54.9
36% 55.4 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 51.6
46% 56.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 130 133 133 133 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 443
Write 136
Mixed 155
SusWrite 128
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 16.9
88% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 41.2
DQ Mixed 55.8
54% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
931GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 102 104 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 97
Write 91.5
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 105
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 20.1
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer i72000/C057 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Medion Erazer i72000/C057

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback