HCL Desktop

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHCL Desktop  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPM41-D3
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 06:44
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 83.3
43% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 67.7
8-Core 72
9% 69.8 Pts
64-Core 82
5% 82 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Device(1B0A 0004) 783MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.58 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.54 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 6.9 7.1 30 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 81.5
Write 68.7
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 20.3
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 58%
hp v301w 32GB
29GB free, PID f340, Hp 32gb Pendrive
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.5 7.6 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 26.8
Write 0.3
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 14.2
11% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 1.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HCL Desktop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback