Acer Aspire XC-605G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605G
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 01:57
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 282
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0750) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 4.53
3% 4.44 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.78
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 129 132 145 130 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 198
Mixed 81
SusWrite 131
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 112%
MIBAO-M2 00 34GB
31GB free, PID 1101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.3 4.6 4.8 4 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.49% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4.4
7% 6.67 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 5%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.3 3.4 2 2.1 2.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 68
SusWrite 2.8
91% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 140 139 141 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 71.1
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 139
139% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.7
313% 3.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 0.6
338% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 89%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA100V 1TB
843GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 141 139 140 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
Read 135
Write 115
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 140
138% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605G Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback