Acer Aspire XC-605G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605G
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 00:25
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 104
2-Core 176
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 247
36% 262 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0750) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 4.41
3% 4.32 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.61
5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 74 33 63 75 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 111
Write 150
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 63.9
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 112%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.3 4.2 4.1 1.5 2.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 3.2
92% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 140 140 141 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 197
Write 182
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 140
199% 153 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 0.8
374% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 0.7
342% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 89%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA100V 1TB
843GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 140 140 141 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 140
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 08G-D3-2133-MR 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.1% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605G Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback