Lenovo 30AH001GIX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 30AH001GIX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 20:04
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 226
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 584
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 30.7
29% 33.5 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 32
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6SB1M256G1001 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X232201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 35 28 34 25 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 319
Write 68.8
Mixed 103
SusWrite 36.1
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 19
99% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 92.1
103% 176 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
38GB free
Firmware: 03.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 69 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 70.5
Write 68.5
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 69
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 69%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
35GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 50 51 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 44
Write 47.8
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 50.3
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 33%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
736GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 119 120 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 61.3
Write 131
Mixed 54
SusWrite 121
133% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
181% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
314GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 89 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 87
Write 91
Mixed 30
SusWrite 89.4
99% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
351GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 84.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 91.5
96% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30AH001GIX Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30AH001GIX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback