Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C855-27M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C855-27M  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 23:23
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 133
59% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 176
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 3.53
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 3
Splatting 4.87
4% 4.31 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCC545050A7E6300 500GB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 77 91 94 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 84.3
Write 75.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 89.6
50% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback