Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C850-A822

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C850-A822 (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '21 at 18:09
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 83.5 2-Core 141 59% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 201 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600 2,324 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	2.66% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 3.1 3% 3.37 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 3.1 2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.66% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 101 78 89 80 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 415 Write 313 Mixed 315 SusWrite 126 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 18.8 72% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 185 163% 242 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79 15,506 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 288GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 118 117 117 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 109 Write 107 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 116 69% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.7 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback