Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TM86

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TM86  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TM86
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100205
Uptime22 Days
Run DateApr 13 '17 at 09:41
Run Duration914 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 108
46% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 150
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 036D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 55.4
Mixed 57.9
44% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 43%
ASMT 2105 250GB
222GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 19.9
Mixed 12.1
23% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.32
43% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 171%
SD Card 64GB
49GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Read 9.4
Write 3.78
Mixed 4.47
6% 5.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.3
12% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.6
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TM86 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TM86

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback