Huawei NBLK-WAX9X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuawei NBLK-WAX9X  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI NBLK-WAX9X-PCB
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 12:58
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 170
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 553
50% 422 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Device(19E5 3E19) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.30.22
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 17
10% 13.7 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 13.8
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D512 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ26402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1460 548 557 612 589 610 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,620
Write 2,049
Mixed 1,492
SusWrite 729
332% 1,473 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 67
217% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 845
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 841
633% 844 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 215%
Great: 261%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
487GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.1 5.9 5.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 39
Write 31.5
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 5.9
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 13%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
554GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.1 6 6 5.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 33.4
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 5.9
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
310GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 29.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 11.2
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 43%
WD Ext HDD 1021 320GB
158GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 29.6
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 11.2
34% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.7 7.8 8 8 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 14.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 7.9
24% 20 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.9
172% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 22.2
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NBLK-WAX9X Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei NBLK-WAX9X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback