Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer LY325
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 01:14
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 237
77% 143 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 408
46% 358 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Device(1A58 1003) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 30
Parallax 8.3
9% 16.4 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D512 512GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 67 100 91 84 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 1,398
Write 34.4
Mixed 80
SusWrite 83.8
84% 399 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 19.7
100% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 57.2
DQ Mixed 125
166% 325 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 40.6
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 28.6
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 3R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 23% 62 62 47 60 13.3" 1280 720 SHP14F2 LQ133M1JW46
History: Score 14: 2R 0G 4B | Score 36: 3R 5G 6B
Typical Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback