Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190730
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 11:30
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 189
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 405
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 75.7
52% 67.2 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 60
Splatting 53.8
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 393
Write 228
Mixed 221
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 25.1
44% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 80
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 18.9
33% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
617GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 179 183 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 181
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 183
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Sony Hard Drive 2TB
95GB free, PID 0b7d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 132 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 98
Write 134
Mixed 90
SusWrite 127
157% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$71
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 30.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 23.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback