Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '19 at 03:36
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 98
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 377
49% 371 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 61 44 67 72 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 60
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 60.5
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 69%
Sony Hard Drive 2TB
147GB free, PID 0b7d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 23.2
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 18.4
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 52%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 23.9
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 19.2
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback