Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 72.4 1-Core 32.5 2-Core 63 39% 56 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 110 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2B4F) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 4.77 Parallax 3.47 2% 3.53 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 277 280 269 252 245 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 390 Write 276 Mixed 264 SusWrite 263 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 24.6 58% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 148 118% 165 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 128%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 4GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 0153 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Read 13.4 Write 5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6.4 8% 7.25 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 7,002 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM