HP 550-153w

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP 550-153w (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B2C
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '16 at 17:23
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$20 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 103 2-Core 181 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 264 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2B2C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4360 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.46 fps	MRender 7.14 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.7 5% 5.72 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 161 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 9 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 60 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 912557943	105% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 404 Mixed 413 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 41 153% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 114 136% 236 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 4GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 0153 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 5.78 Mixed 9.83 16% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.43 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 1.22 109% 2.68 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 64D0JKHHJ 2x8GB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 18.8 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 550-153w Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP 550-153w

CPU
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	82x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	21x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	63x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
HMT425U6CFR6A-PB Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 6GBHynixBench 38%, 177 samples	15x
HMT425U6CFR6A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 6GBHynixBench 38%, 174 samples	14x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $48

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16