HP 280 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 280 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B5E
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161104
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 12:40
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$48
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 114
2-Core 167
74% 123 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 310
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B5E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 6.28
0% 5.05 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 13.9
7% 8.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 51 54 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 124
Write 85.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 50.6
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 104%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
6GB free, PID cd2a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.6 2.1 2 2.4 1.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Read 3
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1.8
3% 2.05 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G2 MT Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback