Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 03:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$35
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 170
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 145
24% 169 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 6.6
5% 4.8 fps
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 85 71 57 88 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 140
Write 77.3
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 69.9
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX Builds (Compare 1,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback