Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '17 at 16:14
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 196
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 494
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 38
Parallax 50.2
33% 42.9 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 35.7
35% 43.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128GB 127GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 505
Write 298
Mixed 349
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 30.9
99% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 76.8
105% 192 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
324GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 28.7
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 2.71
4K Mixed 0.26
127% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
103GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 170
Write 142
Mixed 27.3
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.17
56% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 112%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
705GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 30
Write 30
Mixed 13.7
30% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.06
5% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $272
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback