Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55-USB3  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101101
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 20:30
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$290
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 146
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 368
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
PwrHis(1787 200F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 14.8
14% 15.3 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 17.3
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03i0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 56 60 56 56 43 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 146
Write 110
Mixed 110
SusWrite 54.8
24% 105 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 17.7
61% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 45.7
DQ Mixed 25.4
22% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 80%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
442GB free
Firmware: 3X55
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 61 62 63 73 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 63.8
20% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 18.4
61% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 43
DQ Mixed 25.6
22% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 107%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 157 162 159 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 140
Write 143
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 160
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 100%
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
5.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
Read 166
Write 160
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 12.1
125% 102 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 2.77 MB/s
HGST HUH 721010ALE604 10TB
3TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 12.5
88% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1.2
269% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
607GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 91 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 94.8
Write 97.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 92.4
115% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 55%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
811GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 85 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 90.2
Write 90.3
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 87.7
114% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55-USB3 Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback