Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X399-A  (all builds)
Memory47.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 18:17
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 57
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
70% 133 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 906
80% 680 Pts
64-Core 2,024
125% 2,024 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 176
Parallax 163
139% 170 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 179
Splatting 119
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 598 225 204 191 186 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,735
Write 1234
Mixed 838
SusWrite 265
225% 1,018 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 50.7
174% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 580
435% 588 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 166%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
444GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 386 415 409 428 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 436
Write 434
Mixed 400
SusWrite 413
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 27.2
84% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 114
84% 110 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 90%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
245GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1293 841 847 855 845 841 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,053
Write 909
Mixed 1133
SusWrite 920
278% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 66
212% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 573
DQ Mixed 509
416% 596 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 233%
Great: 372%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
502GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 100
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 97.7
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 96%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
548GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 77 71 77 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 50
Write 86.7
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 74.6
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 68%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
108GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 89 88 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 103
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 88.8
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
466GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 101 101 102 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 101
121% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
15GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 13 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
8.71% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 10.2
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 14
16% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.71%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 37.1
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback