Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '19 at 15:25
Run Duration	333 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 46 1-Core 76.9 2-Core 155 50% 92.5 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 622 55% 466 Pts	64-Core 2,490 154% 2,490 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Lighting 74.2 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 72.5 60% 74 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 72.6 58% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 834 638 611 641 637 588 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	205% Outstanding	Read 1,908 Write 1,545 Mixed 1,073 SusWrite 658 289% 1,296 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 59.6 184% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 922 DQ Write 464 DQ Mixed 845 587% 744 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 205% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 455GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 971 612 577 615 616 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 2,024 Write 1,407 Mixed 1,353 SusWrite 848 314% 1,408 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 99.5 4K Mixed 65.2 212% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 956 DQ Write 647 DQ Mixed 908 649% 837 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 340%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB 9,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 219 212 218 220 211 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 219 Write 228 Mixed 101 SusWrite 215 139% 191 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.6 335% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 138%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 171GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 62 66 64 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 55.8 Write 63 Mixed 47 SusWrite 63.3 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 748GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 61 62 65 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 37.3 Write 93.5 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 61.3 46% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 67%
Kingston DT 101 G2 32GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19.8 Write 8.2 Mixed 6 12% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR 64GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	MC Read 55.7 MC Write 50.4 MC Mixed 58.3 157% 54.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	115x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,000Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $365Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	20x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $105Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $130Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $922

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363