Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 15:25
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 46
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 155
50% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 622
55% 466 Pts
64-Core 2,490
154% 2,490 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 52%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 72.5
60% 74 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 72.6
58% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 834 638 611 641 637 588 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,908
Write 1,545
Mixed 1,073
SusWrite 658
289% 1,296 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 59.6
184% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 845
587% 744 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 205%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
455GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 971 612 577 615 616 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,024
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,353
SusWrite 848
314% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 65.2
212% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 647
DQ Mixed 908
649% 837 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 235%
Great: 340%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 219 212 218 220 211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 219
Write 228
Mixed 101
SusWrite 215
139% 191 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.6
335% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 125%
Great: 138%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
171GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 62 66 64 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 63
Mixed 47
SusWrite 63.3
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
748GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 61 62 65 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 61.3
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 67%
Kingston DT 101 G2 32GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.8
Write 8.2
Mixed 6
12% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR 64GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 58.3
157% 54.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback