PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds) |
Memory | 56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190827 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 15 '19 at 15:25 |
Run Duration | 333 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
52%
Above average
|
50% 92.5 Pts
|
55% 466 Pts
|
154% 2,490 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
|
59.5%
Above average
|
60% 74 fps
|
58% 69.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 834 638 611 641 637 588 MB/s
|
205%
Outstanding
|
289% 1,296 MB/s
|
184% 62.8 MB/s
|
587% 744 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
455GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 971 612 577 615 616 MB/s
|
235%
Outstanding
|
314% 1,408 MB/s
|
212% 71.7 MB/s
|
649% 837 MB/s
|
![]() WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 219 212 218 220 211 MB/s
|
125%
Outstanding
|
139% 191 MB/s
|
335% 2.73 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
171GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 62 66 64 61 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
42% 57.3 MB/s
|
138% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
748GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 61 62 65 62 MB/s
|
28.3%
Poor
|
46% 61.9 MB/s
|
71% 0.53 MB/s
|
|
![]() Kingston DT 101 G2 32GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
12% 11.3 MB/s
|
19% 1.73 MB/s
|
||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples | 155x |
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples | 115x |
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples | 105x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 47x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 36x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $983 |