Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	8.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '20 at 15:14
Run Duration	306 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 113 2-Core 228 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 573 62% 495 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Palit(1569 0FC6) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.93% Terrible	Lighting 9.93 Reflection 9.42 Parallax 11.8 8% 10.4 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 13.1 11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.93% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 241 148 146 143 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 444 Write 366 Mixed 356 SusWrite 179 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 31 106% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 137 133% 209 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 95%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 569GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 137 136 138 137 138 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 96.8 Write 89.1 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 134 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 195% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 85%
WD 2500BEVExternal 250GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 50GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 19 18 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 33.6 Write 35.4 Mixed 26 SusWrite 19.2 38% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 20%
ALCOR Flash Disk 4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.79% Terrible	Read 9 Write 1.5 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 1.6 4% 3.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.79% Great: 5%
TrekStor DS pocket g.u 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 214GB free, PID 0017 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 29 29 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 27.1 Mixed 23 SusWrite 28 37% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 21%
Verbatim STORE N GO 124GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 52GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.8 3.3 4.8 3.3 3.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Read 10.5 Write 2.7 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 3.3 5% 4.57 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 20%
2.0 Flash Disk 2GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 2096 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.15% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 3.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.3 7% 6.72 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.15% Great: 6%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8.2 Write 4.2 Mixed 2.5 5% 4.97 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	59% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 18.2 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 20 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	752x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	508x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	386x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	151x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	145x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	75x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	70x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	66x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	58x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	55x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $391

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16