Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7984
MotherboardMSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984)  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160724
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 09:05
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 525
70% 523 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 0503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1308 MHz, MLim: 1801 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 69.5
42% 63.1 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 55
47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 149 122 127 121 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 463
Mixed 384
SusWrite 165
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60.3
202% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 348
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Samsung G3 Station 1.5TB
385GB free, PID 6013
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 26.4
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 42.4
49% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 2TB
428GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 37.3
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 38.9
49% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 70.7
Write 19.5
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 19.6
45% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3
185% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 105
Write 44.3
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 110
100% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FARG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 18.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984) Builds (Compare 1,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback