Today's hottest deals

Packard imedia S3800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard imedia S3800  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard FIH57
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 20:14
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 41.6
2-Core 73.3
40% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 125
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.680.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 4.9
7% 5.93 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 8.6
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 167 192 192 169 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.1% Average
Read 214
Write 210
Mixed 207
SusWrite 188
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 21.9
65% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 178
137% 187 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB
23GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 21
Write 10.3
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 13.1
18% 14 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.3
158% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hitachi GU512303EP0202 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 7.4
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3800 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback