Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '17 at 19:23
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 404
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2835) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 352.63
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 42
Parallax 53.3
37% 47 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 40
Splatting 39
36% 45.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,981
Write 801
Mixed 1,110
284% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 29.5
172% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 49.2
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 30.4
41% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 183%
Great: 243%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 172
Mixed 168
127% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.23
112% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: CP100-11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 76.2
Write 78.1
Mixed 71.5
57% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.41
97% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 45%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
291GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42% Average
Read 72.3
Write 73.6
Mixed 70.7
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.37
101% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42%
Great: 43%
ORICO NS1066 80GB
9GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 56.9
Write 57.1
Mixed 51.5
71% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.37
62% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback