Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 06 '17 at 07:12
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 205
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 342
43% 326 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2836) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 54.4
38% 47.5 fps
MRender 56.3
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 39
39% 49.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,939
Write 1,279
Mixed 1,451
345% 1,556 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 49.6
196% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 47.1
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 31
79% 154 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 225%
Great: 243%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 153
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.23
101% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: CP100-11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 75.1
Write 72.7
Mixed 73.8
56% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.39
97% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 45%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
193GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 65.2
Mixed 66.3
49% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.35
91% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 12GB
2788, 2788 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback