Today's hottest deals

Lenovo ThinkSystem SR655 -[7Z01CTO1WW]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo ThinkSystem SR655 -[7Z01CTO1WW]-  (all builds)
MotherboardLNVO System Board
Memory123.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 43.3
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 113
42% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 590
52% 439 Pts
64-Core 2,247
139% 2,247 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2547 2558 2556 2564 2569 2459 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 114%
Thinksystem M.2 VD 240GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 277 285 286 292 289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 457
Write 291
Mixed 281
SusWrite 286
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 27.2
98% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 143
109% 148 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB
10GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 10 11 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 112
Write 12
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 11.4
36% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2
112% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 30%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
24GB free, PID 0cc7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 6.8 6.2 5.3 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Read 13
Write 5.8
Mixed 12.1
SusWrite 5.9
12% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2E1 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
220% Outstanding
MC Read 101
MC Write 71.8
MC Mixed 106
265% 92.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 29.8
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 220%
Great: 273%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback